State v. Speights
This text of 437 So. 2d 1387 (State v. Speights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is before the Court on petition to review the decision of the district court of appeal in State v. Speights, 417 So.2d 1168 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). The district court affirmed a trial court order dismissing an information charging burglary under section 810.02, Florida Statutes (1981), for failure to charge the intent to commit a specific offense as part of the burglary charge. In reaching this decision, the district court certified a question of great public importance:
In a prosecution for burglary under section 810.02, Florida Statutes (1981), is it necessary for the State to allege an intent to commit a specific offense?
Id. at 1169. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.
The certified question is identical to that which we have since answered in the negative. State v. Waters, 436 So.2d 66 (Fla.1983). The information, however, must allege the essential statutory element of intent to commit an offense. Id. This essential element was properly alleged in the present case.
The decision of the district court of appeal is quashed and the cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
437 So. 2d 1387, 1983 Fla. LEXIS 2948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-speights-fla-1983.