State v. Speer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Speer

464 P.2d 709, 1 Or. App. 514, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 713

DecidedJanuary 29, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 464 P.2d 709 (State v. Speer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Speer, 464 P.2d 709, 1 Or. App. 514, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 713 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWAB, C. J.

Defendant was indicted for assault with intent to Mil, OBS 163.280, but was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, OBS 163.250. The assault took place when a deputy sheriff was attempting to conduct a “frisk” at the scene of a crime, and the defendant struck the deputy on the head five or six times with a jack handle.

Defendant assigns as error: (1) the failure of the trial court to instruct that defendant could have been found guilty of assault with intent to Mil without malice; and (2) the court’s instruction to the jury that it could find defendant guilty by a verdict of ten of its number.

Assuming, but not deciding, that the court should have instructed on the lesser included offense of attempted manslaughter, there was no conceivable prejudice. The lesser included offense which defendant contends should have been the subject of an instruction carries with it a maximum penalty of 15 years, State v. Collis, 243 Or 222, 413 P2d 53 (1966), while the still lesser included offense of which he was found guilty carries only ten.

The remaining assignment has been decided adversely to defendant’s contention by State v. Gann, 254 Or 549, 463 P2d 570 (1969).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI