State v. Special Road & Bridge District No. Eight

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Special Road & Bridge District No. Eight

115 So. 844, 95 Fla. 387

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 29, 1928·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, consid *388 ered, ordered and decreed-by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, consid *388 ered, ordered and decreed-by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

State v. Special Road & Bridge District No. Eight, 115 So. 844, 95 Fla. 387 (Fla. 1928).

Pincite

115 So. 844 (State v. Special Road & Bridge District No. Eight) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.