State v. Special Disability Trust Fund

795 So. 2d 1105, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13878, 2001 WL 1168215
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 2001
DocketNo. 1D01-0401
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 795 So. 2d 1105 (State v. Special Disability Trust Fund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Special Disability Trust Fund, 795 So. 2d 1105, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13878, 2001 WL 1168215 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

BARFIELD, J.

The employer/self insurer appeal a workers’ compensation order denying their claim for reimbursement under section 440.49(2), Florida Statutes (1983). We reverse.

The state, not the agency, is the employer for purposes of the workers’ compensation act. State, Dept. of Corrections v. Koch, 582 So.2d 5, 6 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, Dept. of Corrections v. Koch, 592 So.2d 679 (Fla.1991). Because the Judge of Compensation Claims found that the claimant’s former personnel officer at the Department of Correction knew of his multiple sclerosis as early as 1978, he erred in concluding that the appellants failed to establish the statutorily required employer knowledge of the preexisting permanent impairment.

Nothing in the language of section 9, chapter 87-330, Laws of Florida, amending section 440.49(2)(g), clearly manifests a legislative intent that the amended statute be retroactively applied, and the 1987 amendment did not lengthen the period for filing the notice of claim for reimbursement for permanent total disability benefits.1 We therefore find that the applicable version of section 440.49(2)(g) is the one which was in effect on the date the claimant was injured at work. See Foley v. Morris, 339 So.2d 215 (Fla.1976); Special Disability Trust Fund, Dept. of Labor & Employment Security, State of Florida v. F. Benson & Company, 626 So.2d 1078 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).

The order is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings in light of this opinion, including a determination of whether the notice of claim was [1107]*1107timely filed under section 440.49(2)(g), Florida Statutes (Supp.1983).

BOOTH and MINER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClanahan v. State
854 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
795 So. 2d 1105, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13878, 2001 WL 1168215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-special-disability-trust-fund-fladistctapp-2001.