State v. Spearman

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Spearman. Read the opinion of the Court — 129 Haw. 146
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided November 8, 2012·No. SCWC-11-0000702·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-11-0000702 08-NOV-2012 02:21 PM

NO. SCWC-11-0000702

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

SARAH V. P. SPEARMAN, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP NO. XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1DTA-11-02146)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Sarah V. P. Spearman’s application for writ of certiorari filed on September 24, 2012, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 8, 2012.

Timothy I. MacMaster, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Spearman, (haw 2012).

State v. Spearman (State v. Spearman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.