State v. Sparks

113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 549, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 151
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1921·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of the present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this writ of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNOeulor, Swayze, TkeNCHArd, PARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACI-I, WHITE, HeBBENHBIMER, WilliaMS, Taylor, GardNer, Aoiceeson, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sparks, 113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 549, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 151 (N.J. 1921).

113 A. 610 (State v. Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.