State v. Sparks

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Sparks

113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 549, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 151

DecidedFebruary 28, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A. 610 (State v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sparks, 113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 549, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 151 (N.J. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of the present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this writ of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNOeulor, Swayze, TkeNCHArd, PARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACI-I, WHITE, HeBBENHBIMER, WilliaMS, Taylor, GardNer, Aoiceeson, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question raised and argued on the writ of error in this case has been considered in the case of State v. Fisher, No. 35 of the present November term, 1920 (ante p. 419); and, for the reason stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of affirmance brought up from the Supreme Court on this writ of error must be reversed, to the end that a new trial may be granted in the Quarter Sessions.

For affirmance — None. For reversal — The ChaNOeulor, Swayze, TkeNCHArd, PARKER, BERGEN, KATZENBACI-I, WHITE, HeBBENHBIMER, WilliaMS, Taylor, GardNer, Aoiceeson, JJ. 12.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A. 610, 95 N.J.L. 549, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sparks-nj-1921.