State v. Sparks

248 S.E.2d 339, 293 N.C. 262, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 930
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 12, 1977·No. No. 90·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ORDER FOR NEW TRIAL UPON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

HAVING reconsidered this case on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States in the light of Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U.S. 684, 44 L.Ed. 2d 508 (1975), and Hankerson v. North Carolina, --- U.S. ---,53 L.Ed. 2d 306 (1977), the defendant having properly raised on appeal to this Court the question of the constitutionality of the trial judge’s instructions placing the burden on the defendant to show that the killing was done in the heat of a sudden passion and that it was done in self-defense, see State v. Sparks, 285 N.C. 631 (1974), and being of the opinion that in light of Mullaney and Hanker-son, these assignments of error should have been sustained and defendant awarded a new trial, now, therefore, it is

ORDERED by the Court in Conference that defendant be and he is hereby awarded a new trial.

This the 12th day of September, 1977.

James G. Exum, Jr. Associate Justice

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sparks, 248 S.E.2d 339, 293 N.C. 262, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 930 (N.C. 1977).

248 S.E.2d 339 (State v. Sparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Booker v. Duke Medical Center
256 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1979)
State v. Sparks
248 S.E.2d 339 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Watson
246 S.E.2d 25 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
State v. Abernathy
244 S.E.2d 696 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)