State v. Sparks

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Sparks

528 So. 2d 160, 1988 La. LEXIS 1521, 1988 WL 78768

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 29, 1988

DocketNo. 88-KA-0017

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 528 So. 2d 160 (State v. Sparks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sparks, 528 So. 2d 160, 1988 La. LEXIS 1521, 1988 WL 78768 (La. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

In re motion by Sheriff of Tangipahoa Parish to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum; 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 48509.

Motion granted in part; denied in part. The subpoena duces tecum is quashed. Defendant is entitled to inspect and copy any document which is a part of the record. Motions to produce and subpoenas duces tecum are inappropriate and unnecessary. The district court retains, after appeal, the jurisdiction to correct an error or deficiency in the record. La.C.Cr.P. 916(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re motion by Sheriff of Tangipahoa Parish to Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum; 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No. 48509.

Motion granted in part; denied in part. The subpoena duces tecum is quashed. Defendant is entitled to inspect and copy any document which is a part of the record. Motions to produce and subpoenas duces tecum are inappropriate and unnecessary. The district court retains, after appeal, the jurisdiction to correct an error or deficiency in the record. La.C.Cr.P. 916(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

528 So. 2d 160, 1988 La. LEXIS 1521, 1988 WL 78768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sparks-la-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack