State v. Southern
331 S.E.2d 688, 314 N.C. 110, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1703
Opinion
The only question before us is whether the Court of Appeals was correct in determining that the trial court erred at sentencing by concluding that certain convictions in which prayer for judgment was continued and no fines or other conditions imposed constituted “prior convictions” under the Fair Sentencing Act, particularly N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.4(a)(l)(o) and -1340.2(4). Believing that the Court of Appeals was correct, we conclude that its decision should be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Southern, 331 S.E.2d 688, 314 N.C. 110, 1985 N.C. LEXIS 1703 (N.C. 1985).
331 S.E.2d 688 (State v. Southern) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mace v. NC Dep't of Ins.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
State v. Doss
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2019
State v. Wilson
676 S.E.2d 512 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2009)
State v. Escoto
590 S.E.2d 898 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Jones
566 S.E.2d 112 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)
State v. Maye
410 S.E.2d 8 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
State v. Wimmer
449 N.W.2d 621 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1989)
State v. Soles
369 S.E.2d 89 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1988)
State v. Bartow
334 S.E.2d 480 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
State v. Benfield
333 S.E.2d 753 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)