State v. South

9 N.E.3d 1061, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1402
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 2014·No. 2014-0563·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Summit App. No. 26967, 2014-Ohio-374. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 1 of the court of appeals’ entry filed March 17, 2014:

“When a defendant is convicted of a R.C. 2941.1413 specification, does Ohio’s OVI statute, R.C. 4511.19 prevail so that a five year sentence can be imposed for a third degree felony OVI or does R.C. 2929.14(A) require that the maximum sentence that can be imposed is three years?”

The conflict case is State v. Sturgill, 12th Dist. Clermont Nos. CA2013-01-002 and CA2013-01-003, [1403]*14032013- Ohio-4648.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. South, 9 N.E.3d 1061, 139 Ohio St. 3d 1402 (Ohio 2014).

9 N.E.3d 1061 (State v. South) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Weideman
2014 Ohio 5768 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Hensley
2014 Ohio 5012 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Hartsook
2014 Ohio 4528 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)