State v. Soukup

646 So. 2d 297, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12289, 1994 WL 700099
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 16, 1994·No. No. 94-320·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

The state appeals the trial court’s order granting Louis Soukup’s motion for new trial. We affirm the entry of the order because the state has not borne its burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that there is no possibility that the cumulative effect of the errors below contributed to appellee’s conviction. Jackson v. State, 575 So.2d 181, 189 (Fla.1991) (citing State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986)); Seaboard Air Line R.R. Co. v. Ford, 92 So.2d 160, 165 (Fla.1956). We hold the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by granting a new trial. State v. Hamilton, 574 So.2d 124, 126 (Fla.1991); Baptist Memorial Hosp., Inc. v. Bell, 384 So.2d 145 (Fla.1980); Castlewood Int’l Corp. v. LaFleur, 322 So.2d 520, 522 (Fla.1975).

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS, C.J., concurs. DAUKSCH, J., concurring in conclusion only without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Soukup, 646 So. 2d 297, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 12289, 1994 WL 700099 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

646 So. 2d 297 (State v. Soukup) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bell
384 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)
Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Ford
92 So. 2d 160 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
State v. Hamilton
574 So. 2d 124 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Jackson v. State
575 So. 2d 181 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Castlewood International Corporation v. LaFleur
322 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)