State v. Sotomayor

794 A.2d 996, 260 Conn. 179, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 152
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 30, 2002·No. SC 16495·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Herminio Sotomayor, appeals, following our grant of certification to appeal, from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the trial court’s judgment of conviction of the crime of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).1 [180]*180State v. Sotomayor, 61 Conn. App. 364, 765 A.2d 1 (2001). We granted the defendant’s petition for certification to appeal limited to the following issue: “Was it harmful error for the trial court to instruct the jury that ‘[o]ne who uses a deadly weapon upon the vital parts of another will be deemed to have intended the probable result of that act,’ to repeat the instruction in response to an inquiry from the jury, and to decline to instruct the jury that use of a deadly weapon could evince an extreme indifference to human life (an element of manslaughter in the first degree) rather than an intent to kill?” State v. Sotomayor, 255 Conn. 952, 770 A.2d 32 (2001).

After examining the entire record on appeal and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, we have determined that the appeal in this case should be dismissed on the ground that certification was improvidently granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Sotomayor, 794 A.2d 996, 260 Conn. 179, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 152 (Colo. 2002).

794 A.2d 996 (State v. Sotomayor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sotomayor v. Commissioner of Correction
41 A.3d 333 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2012)
State v. Grant
928 A.2d 1247 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
State v. Smith
815 A.2d 1216 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
State v. Watkins
806 A.2d 1072 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2002)
Sotomayor v. Connecticut
537 U.S. 922 (Supreme Court, 2002)