State v. Soto

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Soto

505 P.3d 1107, 318 Or. App. 233

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMarch 9, 2022

DocketA174571

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 505 P.3d 1107 (State v. Soto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Soto, 505 P.3d 1107, 318 Or. App. 233 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted February 11, affirmed March 9, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ORRIN KAWIKI KEALOHI SOTO, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 19CR82985; A174571 505 P3d 1107

Mari Garric Trevino, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Nora Coon, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 234 State v. Soto

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree sexual abuse, acknowledging that we have pre- viously held that lack of consent in third-degree sexual abuse was a circumstance element that required only a mental state of criminal negligence. State v. Wier, 260 Or App 341, 353, 317 P3d 330 (2013). But, defendant argues, under the Oregon Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Haltom, 366 Or 791, 824, 472 P3d 246 (2020), that interpretation of the statute is no longer viable. We adhere to our decision in Weir, but we note that the issue is currently before the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. Carlisle (S067880), and resolution of that case will likely affect this one. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted February 11, affirmed March 9, 2022

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ORRIN KAWIKI KEALOHI SOTO, Defendant-Appellant. Tillamook County Circuit Court 19CR82985; A174571 505 P3d 1107

Mari Garric Trevino, Judge. Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Nora Coon, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Michael A. Casper, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. 234 State v. Soto

PER CURIAM Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for third-degree sexual abuse, acknowledging that we have pre- viously held that lack of consent in third-degree sexual abuse was a circumstance element that required only a mental state of criminal negligence. State v. Wier, 260 Or App 341, 353, 317 P3d 330 (2013). But, defendant argues, under the Oregon Supreme Court’s recent decision in State v. Haltom, 366 Or 791, 824, 472 P3d 246 (2020), that interpretation of the statute is no longer viable. We adhere to our decision in Weir, but we note that the issue is currently before the Oregon Supreme Court in State v. Carlisle (S067880), and resolution of that case will likely affect this one. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

505 P.3d 1107, 318 Or. App. 233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-soto-orctapp-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack