State v. Soto-Maldonado

175 So. 3d 929, 2015 WL 5834210
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 2015·No. 2D14-452·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D14-452 )

ANTHONY SOTO-MALDONADO, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________ )

Opinion filed October 7, 2015.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Steven Scott Stephens, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin- Schomaker, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Bryant R. Camareno of Bryant R. Camareno, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Exposito v. State, 891 So. 2d 525,

531 (Fla. 2004) (holding that the State does not have the right to appeal posttrial orders

reducing a charge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.620).

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Soto-Maldonado, 175 So. 3d 929, 2015 WL 5834210 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

175 So. 3d 929 (State v. Soto-Maldonado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Exposito v. State
891 So. 2d 525 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)