Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Soto-Maldonado

State v. Soto-Maldonado

175 So. 3d 929, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14851
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 7, 2015
DocketNo. 2D14-452
StatusPublished

This text of 175 So. 3d 929 (State v. Soto-Maldonado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Soto-Maldonado, 175 So. 3d 929, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14851 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Exposito v. State, 891 So.2d 525, 531 (Fla.2004) (holding that the State does not have the right to appeal posttrial orders reducing a charge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.620).

LaROSE, KHOUZAM, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exposito v. State
891 So. 2d 525 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 3d 929, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 14851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-soto-maldonado-fladistctapp-2015.