State v. Soriano
258 A.2d 361, 54 N.J. 567, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 228
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 107 N. J. Super. 286.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weintraub and Justices Jacobs, Erancis, Proctor, Hall, Schettino and Haneman — 7.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Soriano, 258 A.2d 361, 54 N.J. 567, 1969 N.J. LEXIS 228 (N.J. 1969).
258 A.2d 361 (State v. Soriano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Tilghman
895 A.2d 1207 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2006)
State v. Allah
787 A.2d 887 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2002)
Terminal Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Jersey City
258 A.2d 361 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1969)