State v. Sons

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Sons

47 P.3d 931, 182 Or. App. 257, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 910

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedJune 12, 2002

DocketPR090049; A110194

StatusPublished

This text of 47 P.3d 931 (State v. Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sons, 47 P.3d 931, 182 Or. App. 257, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 910 (Or. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was found guilty of exceeding the maximum speed limit, ORS 811.123, and fined $100. On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he violated ORS 811.123 because no evidence was presented at trial that defendant was the registered owner of the car that was photographed exceeding the speed limit. The state concedes that reversal is required, because this case is factually indistinguishable from State v. Clay, 332 Or 327, 29 P3d 1101 (2001). We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was found guilty of exceeding the maximum speed limit, ORS 811.123, and fined $100. On appeal, he asserts that the trial court erred in concluding that he violated ORS 811.123 because no evidence was presented at trial that defendant was the registered owner of the car that was photographed exceeding the speed limit. The state concedes that reversal is required, because this case is factually indistinguishable from State v. Clay, 332 Or 327, 29 P3d 1101 (2001). We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 P.3d 931, 182 Or. App. 257, 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sons-orctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack