State v. Sommer
This text of 441 P.3d 1202 (State v. Sommer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
¶1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review of this case should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b). The petition for review raises several issues including a challenge to the trial court's imposition of legal financial obligations consisting of a criminal filing fee, DNA collection fee, and a provision for interest to accrue on the financial obligations. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez,
¶2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶3 That the petition for review is granted only as to the legal financial obligations issues. For the reasons explained above, this case is remanded to the trial court to amend the judgment and sentence to strike the requirement to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee, reconsider the DNA collection fee to determine whether the Petitioner's DNA has already been collected, and amend the interest provisions to reflect that interest will not accrue on nonrestitution legal financial obligations after June 7, 2018.
For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 P.3d 1202, 193 Wash. 2d 1013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sommer-wash-2019.