State v. Soles

197 S.E.2d 597, 18 N.C. App. 676, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1979
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 11, 1973
DocketNo. 735SC444
StatusPublished

This text of 197 S.E.2d 597 (State v. Soles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Soles, 197 S.E.2d 597, 18 N.C. App. 676, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1979 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

BRITT, Judge.

Inasmuch as defendant pled guilty, this appeal presents only the question whether error appears on the face of the record proper. State v. Roberts, 279 N.C. 500, 183 S.E. 2d 647 (1971). A careful review of the record discloses no error. The bills of indictment are regular in all respects; defendant’s pleas were understandingly and voluntarily made; and the sentences imposed are within the statutory limits. State v. Roberts, supra; State v. Wyatt, 16 N.C. App. 626, 192 S.E. 2d 683 (1972).

The judgments appealed from are

Affirmed.

Judges Campbell and Baley concur..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wyatt
192 S.E.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
State v. Roberts
183 S.E.2d 647 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 S.E.2d 597, 18 N.C. App. 676, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1979, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-soles-ncctapp-1973.