State v. Sockum
99 A. 833, 29 Del. 350, 6 Boyce 350, 1917 Del. LEXIS 4
New York Court of General Session of the Peace·Decided February 7, 1917·No. No. 5·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The court does not agree with the contention made by counsel for the accused, and declines to give binding instructions.
After the usual charge in such cases,
Verdict, not guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sockum, 99 A. 833, 29 Del. 350, 6 Boyce 350, 1917 Del. LEXIS 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1917).
99 A. 833 (State v. Sockum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Modesto v. State
258 A.2d 287 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1969)
State v. Holland
189 A.2d 79 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1963)
State v. Rabatin
95 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Brown v. United States
66 A.2d 491 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1949)
State v. Witsil
129 A. 862 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1925)