State v. Sockum
99 A. 833, 29 Del. 350, 6 Boyce 350, 1917 Del. LEXIS 4
CourtNew York Court of General Session of the Peace
DecidedFebruary 7, 1917
DocketNo. 5
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 99 A. 833 (State v. Sockum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of General Session of the Peace primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Sockum, 99 A. 833, 29 Del. 350, 6 Boyce 350, 1917 Del. LEXIS 4 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1917).
Opinion
The court does not agree with the contention made by counsel for the accused, and declines to give binding instructions.
After the usual charge in such cases,
Verdict, not guilty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Modesto v. State
258 A.2d 287 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1969)
State v. Holland
189 A.2d 79 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1963)
State v. Rabatin
95 A.2d 431 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Brown v. United States
66 A.2d 491 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1949)
State v. Witsil
129 A. 862 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1925)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
99 A. 833, 29 Del. 350, 6 Boyce 350, 1917 Del. LEXIS 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-sockum-nygensess-1917.