State v. Snyder

2018 Ohio 4260
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Snyder. Read the opinion of the Court — 2016 Ohio 7881
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2018·No. CA2018-05-089·Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Snyder, 2018-Ohio-4260.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, :

Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-05-089

: DECISION - vs - 10/22/2018 :

PETE SNYDER, :

Defendant-Appellant. :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2009-03-0515

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Services, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for plaintiff-appellee

Mary K. Martin, 4660 Duke Drive, Suite 101, Mason, Ohio 45040, for defendant- appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal, the

transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original

papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by

appellant's counsel.

{¶ 2} Counsel for appellant, Pete Snyder, has filed a brief with this court

pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates

that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any ______________________

errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of

error may be predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the

appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record

independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and

without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to

withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5)

certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon

appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.

NOTICE TO CLERK:

Serve a copy of this Decision upon appellant at: Pete Snyder, #A627641, Madison Correctional Institution, 1851 State Route 56, London, Ohio 43140

-2- ______________________

: JUDGMENT ENTRY - vs - :

The brief of appellant, filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), properly before this court and having been considered by the court, it is ordered that the motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is hereby dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

It is further ordered that a mandate be sent to the Butler County Court of Common Pleas for execution upon this judgment and that a certified copy of this Judgment Entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27.

Costs to be taxed to appellant.

____________________________________ Robert A. Hendrickson, Presiding Judge

____________________________________ Robert P. Ringland, Judge

____________________________________ Robin N. Piper, Judge NOTICE TO CLERK:

-3- ______________________

Serve a copy of this Decision upon appellant at: Pete Snyder, #A627641, Madison Correctional Institution, 1851 State Route 56, London, Ohio 43140

-4-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Snyder, 2018 Ohio 4260 (Ohio Ct. App. 2018).

2018 Ohio 4260 (State v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)