State v. Snow

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

State v. Snow

178 A. 927, 133 Me. 515, 1935 Me. LEXIS 50

DecidedApril 8, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 178 A. 927 (State v. Snow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Snow, 178 A. 927, 133 Me. 515, 1935 Me. LEXIS 50 (Me. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

An indictment alleging that respondent embezzled property of which he had possession as executor of the last will of a decedent was held good against general demurrer. State v. Snow, 132 Me., 321.

James D. Maxwell, County Attorney, for State. James M. Gillen, for respondent.

On pleading anew, under leave reserved to him so to do, he was tried by jury and convicted.

There was no prejudicial error in any ruling on the trial. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An indictment alleging that respondent embezzled property of which he had possession as executor of the last will of a decedent was held good against general demurrer. State v. Snow, 132 Me., 321.

James D. Maxwell, County Attorney, for State. James M. Gillen, for respondent.

On pleading anew, under leave reserved to him so to do, he was tried by jury and convicted.

There was no prejudicial error in any ruling on the trial. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A. 927, 133 Me. 515, 1935 Me. LEXIS 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-snow-me-1935.