State v. Snider
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date. 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
8 Plaintiff-Appellee,
9 v. No. 30,209
10 HAL RAYMOND SNIDER, III,
11 Defendant-Appellant.
12 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF EDDY COUNTY 13 Gary L. Clingman, District Judge
14 Gary K. King, Attorney General 15 Santa Fe, NM
16 for Appellee
17 Templeman & Crutchfield, PA 18 Barry C. Crutchfield 19 Lovington, NM
20 for Appellant
21 MEMORANDUM OPINION
22 SUTIN, Judge. 1 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has
3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
4 AFFIRMED.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 __________________________________ 7 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
8 WE CONCUR:
9 _________________________________ 10 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
11 _________________________________ 12 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Snider (State v. Snider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.