State v. Sneed
183 S.W.2d 566
Opinion
On the 18th day of October, 1944, we refused applications for writs of error in the above cases. The applications were refused because we were of the opinion that the State’s suits to recover the land were barred by the one-year statute of limitation. Revised Statutes, Art. 5329, § 4; Caples v. Cole, 129 Tex. 370, 102 S.W.2d 173, 104 S.W.2d 3.
The motions for rehearing are overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Sneed, 183 S.W.2d 566 (Tex. 1944).
183 S.W.2d 566 (State v. Sneed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Aransas Dock and Channel Company
365 S.W.2d 220 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1963)
Alexander v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.
192 S.W.2d 781 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1946)