State v. Sneed

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Sneed

362 S.W.3d 481, 2012 WL 941088, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 346

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 20, 2012

DocketED 95997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 S.W.3d 481 (State v. Sneed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Sneed, 362 S.W.3d 481, 2012 WL 941088, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 346 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

*482 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bradley Sneed (Defendant) appeals from a judgment entered in the Circuit Court of St. Charles County following his conviction for driving while intoxicated. Defendant contends that the trial court erred by failing to hold a hearing on Defendant’s allegation of jury misconduct and overruling his motion for a new trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI