State v. Snader

2019 Ohio 590

• Court: Ohio Court of Appeals
• Decided: February 19, 2019
• Docket: CA2018-07-141 CA2018-07-142 CA2018-07-143
• Status: Published

Opinion

[Cite as State v. Snader, 2019-Ohio-590.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO

BUTLER COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, :

Appellee, : CASE NOS. CA2018-07-141 CA2018-07-142 : CA2018-07-143 - vs - : DECISION 2/19/2019 JENNIFER SNADER, :

Appellant :

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Case No. CR2018-01-0170

Michael T. Gmoser, Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Service Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee

Mary K. Martin, 4660 Duke Drive, Suite 101, Mason, Ohio 45040, for appellant

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by

appellant, Jennifer Snader, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript

of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and

upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be

predicated; (2) lists two potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders

at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without

infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as

counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies

that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response

having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error

prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of

counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is

dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., PIPER and M. POWELL, JJ., concur.

-2- -3-