State v. Smothers
200 S.W.3d 97, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 870, 2006 WL 1675324
Opinion
ORDER
Michael Smothers appeals from his conviction by jury of one count of stealing, § 570.030.1, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Smothers, 200 S.W.3d 97, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 870, 2006 WL 1675324 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
200 S.W.3d 97 (State v. Smothers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mathes v. Sher Express, L.L.C.
200 S.W.3d 97 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)