State v. Smith

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Smith, Appellant.

__________

Appeal From York County John C. Hayes III, Circuit Court Judge

__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-452 Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed July 18, 2012

__________

APPEAL DISMISSED

__________

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Eric Smith appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking probation because no evidentiary showing of fact established the probation violations. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.