State v. Smith

193 P.3d 61, 222 Or. App. 325, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1193
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided September 10, 2008·No. CFH050267; A133878·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992(4) (2003), renumbered as ORS 475.840(3) (2005), arguing that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence a laboratory report pursuant to ORS 475.235 identifying as methamphetamine a substance found during a search of defendant. In this case, the laboratory report was the only evidence admitted at trial concerning the nature of the substance. The state concedes that defendant is entitled to a reversal in light of the holding of State v. Birchfield, 342 Or 624, 157 P3d 216 (2007). We agree and accept the state’s concession.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 193 P.3d 61, 222 Or. App. 325, 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1193 (Or. Ct. App. 2008).

193 P.3d 61 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Smith
193 P.3d 61 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2008)