Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Smith

State v. Smith

803 P.2d 784, 105 Or. App. 404, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 109
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJanuary 23, 1991
Docket89C-20328; CA A62044
StatusPublished

This text of 803 P.2d 784 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Smith, 803 P.2d 784, 105 Or. App. 404, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 109 (Or. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted of theft in the first degree for receiving stolen property. ORS 164.055. As part of her sentence, restitution was ordered. The restitution included $200 that the state concedes should not have been imposed, because it was for damage to the building from which the stolen goods were taken before defendant became involved. We accept the concession.

We affirm defendant’s conviction and remand for resentencing, with instructions to reduce restitution by $200.

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing not inconsistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 164.055
Oregon § 164.055

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
803 P.2d 784, 105 Or. App. 404, 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-orctapp-1991.