State v. Smith
This text of 226 N.E.2d 807 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
An examination of the record shows that the prosecutor, in his argument to the jury, said: ‘1 This man never took the stand to tell you that.”
This is a violation of the rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609.
Defendant made a motion to declare a mistrial, which was overruled; and, in the opinion of this court, this was error.
The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
226 N.E.2d 807, 10 Ohio App. 2d 186, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 342, 1967 Ohio App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-ohioctapp-1967.