State v. Smith

226 N.E.2d 807, 10 Ohio App. 2d 186, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 342, 1967 Ohio App. LEXIS 462
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 8, 1967
Docket10171
StatusPublished

This text of 226 N.E.2d 807 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Smith, 226 N.E.2d 807, 10 Ohio App. 2d 186, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 342, 1967 Ohio App. LEXIS 462 (Ohio Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Long, P. J.

An examination of the record shows that the prosecutor, in his argument to the jury, said: ‘1 This man never took the stand to tell you that.”

This is a violation of the rule of Griffin v. California, 380 U. S. 609.

Defendant made a motion to declare a mistrial, which was overruled; and, in the opinion of this court, this was error.

The judgment is, therefore, reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Judgment reversed.

Hildebeant, J., concurs. Hover, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Griffin v. California
380 U.S. 609 (Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 N.E.2d 807, 10 Ohio App. 2d 186, 39 Ohio Op. 2d 342, 1967 Ohio App. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-ohioctapp-1967.