Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Smith

State v. Smith

825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 289
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 97 Ohio St. 3d 367 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 20, 2005·No. No. 2004-2152·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for resentencing consistent with State v. Jordan, 104 Ohio St.3d 21, 2004-Phio-6085, 817 N.E.2d 864.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Reitz Williamson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 825 N.E.2d 157, 105 Ohio St. 3d 289 (Ohio 2005).

825 N.E.2d 157 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Jordan
104 Ohio St. 3d 21 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2004)