State v. Smith

789 N.E.2d 236, 99 Ohio St. 3d 143

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 89 Ohio St. 3d 323 →

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 11, 2003·No. Nos. 2002-1582 and 2002-1645·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the sole proposition of law, which reflects the certified issue, is affirmed on the authority of State v. Fisher, 99 Ohio St.3d 127, 2003-Ohio-2761, 789 N.E.2d 222.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Con-nor,' JJ., concur. Cook, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 789 N.E.2d 236, 99 Ohio St. 3d 143 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

789 N.E.2d 236 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

State v. Fisher

789 N.E.2d 222 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Opinion

Related