State v. Smith

655 N.E.2d 409, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2401
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Ohio St. 3d 1452
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 6, 1995·No. 95-1964·Published

Opinion

Licking County, No. 93CA24. Appellant has filed an untimely appeal of the court of appeals’ decision denying his application for reopening under App.R. 26(B) and a motion for delayed appeal. This appeal involves a civil, post-conviction matter and not an appeal of a felony case to which the provisions for delayed appeal in S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(4) apply. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for delayed appeal be, and hereby is, stricken, effective October 3, 1995.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that, in that appellant failed to perfect an appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(2)(A)(1), this case be, and hereby is, dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 655 N.E.2d 409, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1411, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2401 (Ohio 1995).

655 N.E.2d 409 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.