State v. Smith

631 N.E.2d 1065, 69 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 1030
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 Ohio St. 3d 284
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided April 29, 1994·No. 94-566·Published

Opinion

Clark County, No. 3010. This cause is pending before the court on the filing of a motion for an order directing the Court of Appeals for Clark County to certify its record. Appellant’s request for extension of time to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction was denied by this court on March 17,1994. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, sica sponte, effective April 28, 1994.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 631 N.E.2d 1065, 69 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1994 Ohio LEXIS 1030 (Ohio 1994).

631 N.E.2d 1065 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.