State v. Smith

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Smith

155 N.W.2d 368, 182 Neb. 458, 1968 Neb. LEXIS 411

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 5, 1968·No. 36639·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Smith, J.

In this post conviction proceeding the district court overruled defendant’s motion for a new trial because the motion had been filed out of time. Defendant contends on appeal that he was unavoidably prevented from filing the motion timely. No' such statement appears in the motion itself, and the bill of exceptions discloses nothing relevant. The, judgment is affirmed. See, § *459 25-1143, R. R. S. 1943; Roggencamp v. Dobbs, 15 Neb. 620, 20 N. W. 100.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, J.

In this post conviction proceeding the district court overruled defendant’s motion for a new trial because the motion had been filed out of time. Defendant contends on appeal that he was unavoidably prevented from filing the motion timely. No' such statement appears in the motion itself, and the bill of exceptions discloses nothing relevant. The, judgment is affirmed. See, § *459 25-1143, R. R. S. 1943; Roggencamp v. Dobbs, 15 Neb. 620, 20 N. W. 100.

Affirmed.

State v. Smith, 155 N.W.2d 368, 182 Neb. 458, 1968 Neb. LEXIS 411 (Neb. 1968).

Pincite

155 N.W.2d 368 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related