State v. Smith

North Dakota Supreme Court

State v. Smith

2017 ND 129, 895 N.W.2d 313, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 144

CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedJune 7, 2017

Docket20170022

StatusPublished

This text of 2017 ND 129 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 2017 ND 129, 895 N.W.2d 313, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 144 (N.D. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Michael Smith appeals from a criminal judgment entered after the district court found him guilty of aggravated assault—domestic violence. Smith argues the evidence was insufficient and not sufficiently credible to support the conviction of aggravated assault—domestic violence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding sufficient evidence supports the district court’s conviction.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Jerod E. Tufte

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

[¶ 1] Michael Smith appeals from a criminal judgment entered after the district court found him guilty of aggravated assault—domestic violence. Smith argues the evidence was insufficient and not sufficiently credible to support the conviction of aggravated assault—domestic violence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding sufficient evidence supports the district court’s conviction.

[¶ 2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C. J. Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Carol Ronning Kapsner Jerod E. Tufte

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2017 ND 129, 895 N.W.2d 313, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-nd-2017.