State v. Smith
This text of 2013 ND 91 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 6/19/13 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2013 ND 91
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Drew Marvin Smith, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20120430
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Debbie Gordon Kleven, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Andrew C. Eyre (argued), under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, and Carmell F. Mattison (appeared), Assistant State’s Attorney, 124 S. 4th Street, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206-5607, for plaintiff and appellee.
David N. Ogren, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, 405 Bruce Avenue, Suite 101, Grand Forks, ND 58201, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Smith
[¶1] Drew Smith appeals from a criminal judgment after a jury found him guilty of attempted robbery, terrorizing, and simple assault. On appeal, he argues the trial evidence was insufficient to support his attempted robbery conviction. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 ND 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-nd-2013.