State v. Smith
193 S.E.2d 117, 17 N.C. App. 162, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.C. App. 583 →
Opinion
Defendant’s counsel states that, except for the admission of certain exhibits, he is unable to discover prejudicial error in the trial and urges that the court scrutinize the record to determine if error appears. The exhibits, which were introduced over defendant’s objections, were relevant and their admission into evidence did not constitute prejudicial error. We have reviewed the record and find no prejudicial error.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Smith, 193 S.E.2d 117, 17 N.C. App. 162, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1610 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).
193 S.E.2d 117 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.