State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Smith

818 S.E.2d 100

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 21, 2018·No. 290A17·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. With respect to the additional issues raised by the parties' petitions for discretionary review, we conclude that discretionary review was improvidently allowed. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals as to these matters remains undisturbed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. With respect to the additional issues raised by the parties' petitions for discretionary review, we conclude that discretionary review was improvidently allowed. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals as to these matters remains undisturbed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

State v. Smith, 818 S.E.2d 100 (N.C. 2018).

Pincite

818 S.E.2d 100 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.