State v. Smith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Smith

116 S.E.2d 735, 253 N.C. 289, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 500

DecidedNovember 2, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E.2d 735 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 116 S.E.2d 735, 253 N.C. 289, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 500 (N.C. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly overruled. The only evidence was that offered by the State. It was sufficient, if accepted by the jury, to support findings as to all. essential matters alleged in the warrant. Assignments of error relating to rulings on evidence and portions of the charge do not disclose prejudicial error. Discussion of these assignments in detail is dpemed unnecessary. The verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant’s motion for judgment of nonsuit was properly overruled. The only evidence was that offered by the State. It was sufficient, if accepted by the jury, to support findings as to all. essential matters alleged in the warrant. Assignments of error relating to rulings on evidence and portions of the charge do not disclose prejudicial error. Discussion of these assignments in detail is dpemed unnecessary. The verdict and judgment will not be disturbed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 S.E.2d 735, 253 N.C. 289, 1960 N.C. LEXIS 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-nc-1960.