State v. . Smith
This text of 78 N.C. 462 (State v. . Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The indictment charges the defendant' with having forged an order for sixty dollars and seven cents. There was no evidence tending to show that he had forged an order for that amount, and of course he ought not to have been convicted.
The only evidence introduced related to two orders, — one for sixty dollars, and the other for sixty dollars and twenty seven cents.
"Whether these discrepancies between the charge and the proof really appeared on the trial, or whether they are the result of a careless record, we do not know. We are bound by the record.
One of the witnesses for the State, the Solicitor, was permitted to testify for the State without being sworn, the defendant objecting. This was error.-
Error.
Per Curiam. Venire de novo.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 N.C. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-nc-1878.