State v. Smith
This text of 335 Mont. 26 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On October 13, 1998, the defendant was sentenced to Count I: Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison, for the offense of Assault, a felony; and Ten (10) years in the Montana State Prison for use of a weapon during the commission of the offense, to run consecutively to Count I and with the sentence imposed in Cause No. DC-97-108.
On March 6, 2006, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Ann German. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was farther advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant informed the Sentence Review Division that he did not understand the process of the sentence review hearing. Ms. German requested a continuance in this matter to have additional time to explain the process of a sentence review hearing to the defendant and what other options may be available to him.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the application for review of sentence shall be continued to the August 2006 sentence review hearings to allow counsel time to prepare the defendant for his sentence review hearing.
Done in open Court this 6 th day of March, 2006.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
335 Mont. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-mont-2006.