State v. Smith

214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2007 WL 446986
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2007·No. ED 87747·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Hattie Smith appeals her conviction on one count each of first degree assault and armed criminal action. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 214 S.W.3d 351, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 221, 2007 WL 446986 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

214 S.W.3d 351 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
276 S.W.3d 314 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)