State v. Smith

52 S.W.3d 643, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1369, 2001 WL 910382
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1680
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 14, 2001·No. No. ED 78488·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Nicholas Smith, appeals from his convictions for first degree assault in violation of Section 565.050,1 armed criminal action in violation of section 571.015, and felonious restraint in violation of Section 565.120. He contends the trial court erroneously sustained an objection to defense counsel’s closing argument. We affirm.

Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial did not err. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential value. We [644]*644have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 52 S.W.3d 643, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1369, 2001 WL 910382 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

52 S.W.3d 643 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.