State v. Smith

862 S.W.2d 390, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1440
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 606
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 14, 1993·No. Nos. 60247, 62765·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was charged by information and convicted by a jury of first degree robbery and armed criminal action. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to concurrent twenty-five year pris[391]*391on terms. His Rule 29.15 motion was denied after an evidentiary hearing. He appeals the conviction and the denial of his post-conviction motion. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 862 S.W.2d 390, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1440 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

862 S.W.2d 390 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.