State v. Smith
705 S.W.2d 584, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3633
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Convicted defendant challenges only the denial of his motion to strike a venireman who had vaguely answered defendant’s verbose, complex question concerning presumption of innocence. Before and after this the venireman had declared he presumed defendant was innocent.
The ruling was within the trial court’s discretion; no error of law appears and a full opinion would have no precedential value.
Affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.-25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Smith, 705 S.W.2d 584, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3633 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).
705 S.W.2d 584 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
736 S.W.2d 516 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)