State v. Smith

705 S.W.2d 584, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3633
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 14, 1986
DocketNo. 49719
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 705 S.W.2d 584 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Smith, 705 S.W.2d 584, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3633 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CLEMENS, Senior Judge.

Convicted defendant challenges only the denial of his motion to strike a venireman who had vaguely answered defendant’s verbose, complex question concerning presumption of innocence. Before and after this the venireman had declared he presumed defendant was innocent.

The ruling was within the trial court’s discretion; no error of law appears and a full opinion would have no precedential value.

Affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.-25(b).

KELLY, P.J., and KAROHL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. State
736 S.W.2d 516 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 S.W.2d 584, 1986 Mo. App. LEXIS 3633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-moctapp-1986.