State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Smith

125 S.W. 460, 225 Mo. 579, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 26

DecidedFebruary 12, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.W. 460 (State v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Smith, 125 S.W. 460, 225 Mo. 579, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 26 (Mo. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

BURGESS, J.

On the 10th day of November, 1908, the prosecuting attorney of Webster county filed in the circuit court of said county an information, duly verified, charging the defendant with unlawfully and wilfully practicing medicine and surgery, and attempting to treat the sick and afflicted, without first having obtained a license from the State Board of Health. After arraignment and plea of not guilty, defendant was placed upon trial, the jury returning a verdict of guilty, assessing his punishment at a fine of fifty dollars. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict, and defendant appealed to this court.

This being an appeal from a conviction under an information charging the defendant' with a misdemeanor, and there being no constitutional question properly raised so as to give this court jurisdiction, the cause is ordered transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BURGESS, J.

On the 10th day of November, 1908, the prosecuting attorney of Webster county filed in the circuit court of said county an information, duly verified, charging the defendant with unlawfully and wilfully practicing medicine and surgery, and attempting to treat the sick and afflicted, without first having obtained a license from the State Board of Health. After arraignment and plea of not guilty, defendant was placed upon trial, the jury returning a verdict of guilty, assessing his punishment at a fine of fifty dollars. Judgment was entered in accordance with the verdict, and defendant appealed to this court.

This being an appeal from a conviction under an information charging the defendant' with a misdemeanor, and there being no constitutional question properly raised so as to give this court jurisdiction, the cause is ordered transferred to the Springfield Court of Appeals.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

125 S.W. 460, 225 Mo. 579, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-smith-mo-1910.