State v. Smith

869 So. 2d 835, 2004 La. LEXIS 868, 2004 WL 816387
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 793 So. 2d 1199
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 19, 2004·No. No. 2004-KH-0551·Published

Opinion

In re Smith, Odis David; — Defendant; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 334157.

Writ granted. The court of appeal is ordered to accept and consider relator’s pro se filing. State v. Melon, 95-2209 (La.9/22/95), 660 So.2d 466 (“Meaningful access to courts guaranteed by La. Const, art. I, Sections 2,19 and 22 requires courts [836]*836to accept and consider post-verdict pro se filings from represented defendants.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 869 So. 2d 835, 2004 La. LEXIS 868, 2004 WL 816387 (La. 2004).

869 So. 2d 835 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Melon
660 So. 2d 466 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)