State v. Smith

684 So. 2d 405, 1996 La. LEXIS 3434, 1996 WL 707470
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 639 So. 2d 237
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided December 6, 1996·No. No. 96-KH-2743·Published

Opinion

In re Smith, James; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 96KW-1934; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “J”, No. 278-029.

Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of documents he filed on or about July 16, 1996. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file, and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.

BLEICH, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Smith, 684 So. 2d 405, 1996 La. LEXIS 3434, 1996 WL 707470 (La. 1996).

684 So. 2d 405 (State v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.